It is regrettable that the name of the International Committee of the Red Cross is associated with the separatists.
It is truly regrettable that the International Committee of the Red Cross, a globally respected humanitarian organization, finds itself associated with both the Armenian state and separatist groups. This organization, entrusted with the noble mission of providing assistance in times of crisis, appeared to exhibit double standards during the Patriotic War. Their actions, such as attempting to extract Armenian prisoners from Fuzuli and the illicit transport of weapons and ammunition along the Lachin-Khankendi road, raise questions about the alignment of their actions with their principles.
Umud Rahimoglu, the head of the International Eurasian Press Foundation, voiced these concerns. He emphasized recent events in the Karabakh economic region, which shed light on the intentions of separatist entities and certain international organizations. They portrayed Armenians as suffering from prolonged hunger and facing a "humanitarian disaster." However, if a village or town's residents truly suffered from hunger, why would they reject food supplies intended for their children, elderly residents, and the sick? It's evident that this portrayal is far from the reality of a "humanitarian disaster."
On August 29, the Azerbaijan Red Crescent Society took a commendable step by sending a shipment of 40 tons of flour products. Unfortunately, this convoy has been awaiting clearance at the entrance gate of an area temporarily under the control of Russian peacekeepers. This raises questions: why should such a benevolent and well-intentioned initiative be delayed or underestimated? Additionally, why should the International Committee of the Red Cross office in Khankend be affiliated with Yerevan instead of Baku, especially if Karabakh is recognized as part of Azerbaijan? This raises concerns about the organization's lack of respect towards Azerbaijan.
Our interviewer added to these thoughts, highlighting the clear intentions of the so-called regime controlled by Armenia and separatists. They seem determined to negotiate for their interests, preventing Azerbaijan from implementing its principles. The "Hunger Show" once again exposed the questionable tactics employed by Armenia, although some countries remain entangled in this game, others see through it.
The passage concludes with a reminder that adherence to the rules of one's own country is essential, emphasizing Azerbaijan's steadfastness in defending its rightful position. Despite numerous challenges, Azerbaijan's position will ultimately vindicate itself in the near future.